Activism:
This week we hosted a bag decorating event with the Girl Scouts where we not only decorated brown paper bags, but we filled them with hygiene products for the women staying at SafeHouse. This week was good because I finally got to meet the entire troop and I feel like we were able to make some concrete progress with the Girl Scouts and with service learning in general. The event was successful and we ended up having a lot more products for the bags than we initially expected, which left us with over 50 bags to donate! Although we made contact with the scouts this week and were able to put donations together, I got the feeling that most of the girls didn’t care about what we were actually doing. A lot of the girls didn’t want to participate and we had to push them to make more than one bag. I was also able to get some planning for the unit event done, so hopefully our successes for this next week will include the unit event. I think we definitely need to make a point to the girls as to the reasoning behind everything we are doing and maybe try to engage them without the troop leaders there all the time.
Reflection:
This week I realized that through our service learning project we are basically solidifying girl’s definition of leadership. In Girl Talk: Adolescent Girls’ Perceptions of Leadership, Shinew and Jones illustrate that girls already define leadership as “compassionate” and “caring” (60). And in Changing it Up!, the Girl Scouts research shows that girls identify leadership as a way to institute social change (8). Through the activities we have planned for the girls we play right into the notion that girls already have about leadership, which is being a leadership through social change. Through reading Shinew and Jones it occurred to me that finding a way to incorporate the talents of each girl into the leadership opportunities that we created through our project would have been a better way to teach leadership and appeal to the girls. I think that the Girl Scouts as an organization, as least, try to teach effective leadership in the ways that our readings suggest. However, I have noticed that the Girls Scouts function more through the girls doing projects that are decided by higher-ups, which is ineffective for teaching real leadership skills.
Reciprocity:
I am personally gaining satisfaction from the part of this project that works with SafeHouse, however I still have no formula for successful youth leadership. This experience continues to show me why youth leadership is so difficult; this week it has been the problem of motivation. The project fits into a feminist perspective because it’s girls working for social justice and for a greater good. I find myself needing to put more into organizations like SafeHouse and give to those in need; in my perspective there is nothing more “feminist” than doing this.
Word Count: 494
Works Cited
Fleshman, Paula, and Salmond, Kimberlee, and Schoenberg, Judy. Change it Up! What Girls Say About Redefining Leadership. New York: Girl Scouts of the USA, 2008. Executive Summary.
Shinew, Dawn M., and Deborah Thomas Jones. "Girl Talk: Adolescent Girls' Perceptions of Leadership." Geographies of Girlhood: Identities In-between. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005. 55-65. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment